What is an Options-Based Income ETF?

Quick Definition: Options-based income ETFs are funds that use options strategies like covered calls to generate high distributions and distributions, often paying weekly or monthly with yields ranging from 7% to 85%+.

If you're anything like me, when a friend or some random video starts discussing "options trading" I just shut down a bit because I don't really care. All I care about is if it makes money or not. Does more than I put in come out the other side?

Think of Options-Based Income ETFs as turbocharged dividend assets that use financial engineering to boost payouts. Instead of waiting for companies to decide on quarterly dividends, these funds actively generate income through options strategies.

As someone who's been fascinated by complex systems my entire life, I found options-based ETFs particularly interesting. They're like sophisticated software programs that automatically execute income-generating strategies. The best part? An investor can get started with very little just to learn and try out how they work.

Understanding What You're Really Buying

Before we go any further, let me be brutally honest about what these funds actually do - because the marketing materials won't tell you this clearly enough.

When you see a fund advertising 60%, 80%, or even 100%+ annual yields, you're not looking at free money or some magical investment strategy. You're looking at a fund that's systematically converting your principal into distributions. It's financial alchemy, but not the kind that creates gold - it's the kind that converts your $100 bill into ten $10 bills and calls it "income."

Think of it this way: If I gave you $100,000 and then handed you back $1,923 every week for a year (totaling $100,000), would you call that "earning income"? Of course not - I just gave you your own money back in installments. Yet that's essentially what many ultra-high-yield options ETFs do, dressed up with complex options terminology.

The distribution rate is NOT the same as total return. This is the single most important concept to understand. A fund can pay you 50% in distributions while your total investment value drops 40%. You haven't made 50% - you've lost 40% of your capital while receiving some of it back as "income."

I'm not saying these funds are scams or worthless - I use them myself. But I use them with my eyes wide open, understanding that I'm trading long-term capital appreciation for short-term cash flow, and I keep my allocation small enough that if things go sideways, it won't crater my entire portfolio.

Table of Contents ⇡

A Quick Note on Options Complexity

Before we dive deeper, I want to be upfront here: The options strategies I'm covering briefly in this article - covered calls, synthetic positions, iron condors - represent an entirely different conversation with layers of complexity that could fill books.

As someone who's built systems from the ground up since the early '90s, I appreciate understanding how things work internally. But when it comes to Options-Based Income ETFs, I focus primarily on input and output. I care about what I put in (my investment) and what I get out (distributions and potential appreciation). The specific mechanics of how the fund managers execute their options strategies? That's their expertise, not mine.

This is a classic scenario of "I don't care how you do it, just do it" and then pay me. If the value drops beyond stupid levels and/or the payouts drop, I'm moving my money elsewhere. That's it. Simple. Keep the blah, blah, blah to yourself.

Think of it like using a smartphone. I don't need to understand every line of code in the operating system to make calls, send texts, or use apps effectively. Similarly, an investor doesn't need to master options trading to benefit from these funds.

I'm providing a high-level explanation of how these strategies work internally because it helps investors understand what they're buying. But remember - the fund managers are the ones actually executing these complex trades. An investor's job is to understand the risk-return profile and decide if it fits their goals.

Here's a top 10 list of the highest yielding OBI-ETFs currently (by yield%)...

Table of Contents ⇡

How Options-Based Income ETFs Work

These assets don't work like traditional ETFs that simply hold stocks or bonds. Instead, they use options contracts as their primary income engine. It's similar to how I used to write automated trading software in '95 - systematic strategies designed to generate consistent results.

Here's how the process typically works…

The income from these strategies gets distributed to shareholders, often weekly or monthly. Assets like the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) typically yield around 7-9% annually with monthly payouts, while some YieldMax funds can yield 20-80% annually with weekly distributions.

Table of Contents ⇡

The NAV Erosion Trap: Why High Yields Can Destroy Wealth

This section might save you thousands - or tens of thousands - of dollars. Pay close attention.

Net Asset Value (NAV) erosion is the silent killer of options-based ETF portfolios. While you're celebrating weekly distributions hitting your account, the underlying value of your investment can be quietly evaporating. Here's a real-world example:

Let's say you invest $10,000 in a high-yield options ETF advertising a 60% annual distribution rate. Sounds amazing, right? You'll get $6,000 in distributions over the year!

But here's what actually happens in many cases:

Return of Capital (ROC) is another critical concept most investors misunderstand. When a fund pays distributions that exceed its actual earnings, it's literally giving you your own money back. It's like taking $100 out of your left pocket, moving it to your right pocket, and calling it "income." The IRS doesn't even tax it as income - because it isn't. It's just your capital being returned to you.

According to recent fund disclosures, some ultra-high-yield ETFs have distributions composed of 80-100% return of capital. That means virtually none of what you're receiving is actual investment profit. You're just watching your investment slowly liquidate itself while it sends you checks.

Why does this happen? In volatile or declining markets, the options strategies these funds use can't generate enough premium income to cover their distribution rates. Rather than cut distributions (which would cause investors to flee and tank the fund's assets under management), they dip into capital to maintain those eye-popping yields.

This is why I cannot stress enough: These funds are NOT suitable as core holdings or as the majority of anyone's portfolio. They're tactical tools for sophisticated investors who understand exactly what they're trading off. For everyone else, they're financial landmines wrapped in attractive distribution yields.

Table of Contents ⇡

Why I Find These Assets Compelling (With Extreme Caution)

Despite everything I've just said about the risks, I still use options-based income ETFs in my portfolio. Why? Because when used correctly, in limited doses, and with realistic expectations, they can serve a purpose.

After years of dividend investing, I've learned to appreciate assets that generate consistent cash flow. Options-based income ETFs appeal to me for several reasons - but notice I'm qualifying every single one of these benefits…

I learned early in my trading days that consistent income beats sporadic windfalls. These assets provide that consistency, though with important trade-offs that can gut your portfolio if you're not careful.

My personal rule: Options-based ETFs never exceed 15-20% of my total portfolio, and ultra-high-yielders (40%+ distributions) never exceed 5%. This way, if they implode - and some will - they can't take my entire financial future with them.

Table of Contents ⇡

Real-World Investor Scenarios

Here's how different investors might approach options-based income ETFs - note the careful allocation percentages…

Please keep in mind that I'm not a professional or licensed financial advisor and this is not financial advice. I create all of my articles based on my personal experience and research. Check out our full disclaimer(s).

Table of Contents ⇡

Understanding the Risks

Like any sophisticated system, options-based income ETFs have potential drawbacks. From my software development background, I know that complex systems can fail in unexpected ways - and fail catastrophically when they do.

Table of Contents ⇡

Getting Started with Options-Based Income ETFs

Based on my systems thinking approach and hard-earned lessons, here's how to begin - if you absolutely must…

1. Education First (And I Mean REALLY First)

   
   Learn the basics of options strategies and understand the fundamentals before investing a single dollar. Read about NAV erosion, return of capital, and total return versus distribution rate. Spend at least a month researching before buying. You don't need to be an expert to use these for income, but you absolutely must understand what NAV and ROC mean and how they can devastate your returns.

2. Start With Paper Trading or Tiny Positions

   
   Before committing real money, track these funds for 3-6 months. Watch what happens to NAV during market volatility. See how distributions change. Start with $500-1,000 maximum on your first position - just enough to learn, not enough to hurt.

3. Choose Your Platform

   
   Select a brokerage that offers commission-free ETF trading and fractional shares. Check out Everdend's Top Brokerage Picks for suitable options.

4. Start Conservative (Seriously, Be Boring)

   
   Begin with diversified options-based ETFs like JEPI, JEPQ, or DIVO rather than single-stock or ultra-high-yield funds. These moderate funds (7-12% yields) have better track records of NAV stability. It's like testing new software with a small dataset before scaling up. Never start with the 50%+ yielders - those are advanced tools for experienced investors who understand they're trading principal for distributions.

5. Monitor Performance Obsessively

   
   Track both distributions AND Net Asset Value weekly. Set alerts if NAV drops more than 10-15%. Some funds excel at income generation but will struggle catastrophically with capital preservation. If you're receiving great distributions but NAV is down 20%, you're not winning - you're losing.

6. Limit Your Allocation Strictly

   
   Never allocate more than 15-20% of your total portfolio to options-based ETFs. Keep ultra-high-yielders (40%+ distributions) to 5% maximum. This is not a suggestion - this is a critical risk management requirement. If you ignore this, you're gambling, not investing.

7. Diversify Appropriately

   
   Don't put all assets into options-based ETFs. Combine them with traditional dividend stocks, REITs, and other income-generating assets. The bulk of your portfolio should be in proven, stable assets with long track records. Options-based ETFs should be the seasoning, not the main course.

Table of Contents ⇡

My Perspective on Options-Based Income Assets

I appreciate the systematic approach these funds take to income generation. They're not magic - they're sophisticated tools that trade potential capital appreciation for current income. And sometimes they trade your capital itself for current "income."

I view them as one small component of a diversified income portfolio - emphasis on "small." Like having multiple revenue streams in business, combining options-based ETFs with traditional dividend assets, REITs, and other income sources creates a more robust system. But if one revenue stream is unstable and eating into your capital base, you can't let it grow to dominate your business.

The key is understanding what an investor is really getting. High yields often come with high risks and trade-offs, whether it's NAV erosion, increased volatility, or tax implications. When 60-100% of your "income" is actually return of capital, you're not building wealth - you're liquidating it in installments.

My bottom line after years of using these funds: They can work, but only as tactical, limited allocations with constant monitoring. The moment I see sustained NAV erosion or distributions being funded primarily by ROC, I exit. I don't care how attractive the yield looks on paper. If the underlying asset value is deteriorating, that's not an income investment - that's a melting ice cube that pays me while it melts.

Use these funds if you must, but use them wisely, sparingly, and with eyes wide open to what you're actually trading off. Your future self will thank you for the caution.

Table of Contents ⇡

Strange But True: The First "Options Fund" Was Technically Born in a Smoky 17th-Century Amsterdam Tavern

Long before ETFs or Wall Street even existed, 1600s Dutch merchants were trading options contracts in the backrooms of Amsterdam taverns - maybe even sometimes scribbled on napkins or scraps of parchment. These early options weren't used for income generation per se, but the practice of "buying the right, but not the obligation" to purchase cargo or commodities laid the groundwork for modern options strategies.

Fast forward four centuries, and we now have AI-powered ETFs executing thousands of covered calls per day - delivering weekly cash payouts to everyday investors from the comfort of their phone screens. From beer-stained wooden tables to blockchain-cleared trades, options-based income investing has come a long (and weird) way.

Table of Contents ⇡

FAQs

Table of Contents ⇡

High Stakes

Options-based income ETFs represent an interesting but dangerous evolution in income investing. They use sophisticated strategies to generate frequent, high-yield distributions that can enhance an investor's cash flow - but often at the cost of principal erosion that can devastate long-term wealth.

Like any tool, they work best when used appropriately as part of a diversified approach - and when used sparingly. An investor shouldn't expect them to replace traditional dividend investing entirely. In fact, they shouldn't represent more than a modest portion of any portfolio. They can complement other income-generating assets effectively, but only if you understand that you're trading long-term capital appreciation for short-term cash flow.

The harsh reality: Most retail investors who pile into ultra-high-yield options ETFs (50%+ distribution rates) will lose money on a total return basis. They'll receive impressive distributions that feel like income, while their principal quietly evaporates. When they finally check their total account value after a year or two, they'll discover they're down 20-40% despite receiving all those distributions. That's not income investing - that's wealth destruction with a monthly paycheck.

If you take nothing else away from this article, remember these critical points:

The key is starting with education, beginning conservatively with tiny positions, and understanding both the benefits and risks before committing significant capital. Whether someone is just starting their investment journey or looking to enhance an existing income portfolio, Options-Based Income ETFs deserve consideration - but only with proper research, realistic expectations, and strict risk management.

Remember, sustainable wealth building takes time and diversification. These assets can be valuable components of that journey when used correctly in small doses, but they're specialized tools, not magic solutions. The real magic happens through consistent investing in proven assets, continuous learning, and patient capital allocation over decades - not chasing the highest yields without understanding what you're really buying.

I use options-based ETFs myself, but I use them with caution, skepticism, and strict position limits. I suggest you do the same - or better yet, avoid them entirely until you've built a solid foundation of traditional dividend stocks, index funds, and bonds. There's no shame in sticking with boring, proven strategies that actually build wealth over time.